Building Name

Church of St Francis Gorton Manchester

Date
1863 - 1872
Street
89 Gorton Lane
District/Town
Gorton, Manchester
County/Country
GMCA, England
Work
New Build
Status
Converted to conference centre
Listed
Grade II*

On 27 December 1861 a small group of Franciscan friars obtained the permission of the Right Reverend Dr Turner, Bishop of Salford, to settle in the diocese. Here they joined the Rev Father Cardinal who was then building a school at Bankfield Cottage in Gorton, at the time still a semi-rural area. The Franciscans determined to establish a priory on the site and, in 1863, commissioned Edward Welby Pugin to prepare designs for the church.  The foundation stone of the monastery was laid on the Feast of Pentecost 1863 and on 4 October 1863 the first wing was solemnly blessed and dedicated by Bishop Turner. This was used as a temporary chapel until the completion of the church. Bishop Turner laid the corner stone of the church on 9 June 1866. However, due to a continuing shortage of funds for the purchase of building materials, progress was pitifully slow. For a period in 1871 work stopped completely and the church was not finally opened until 26 September 1872.

Pugin's design was intended to be awe-inspiring and dramatic, a symbol and show-piece of Roman Catholicism and a demonstration of the power of the Franciscan order. Rising majestically above the tight packed streets of bye-law housing, the church, of red brick with white stone dressings appeared from a distance 'as if it was made of icing sugar' (1). The style chosen was late 13th century Gothic with the main body of the church built in polychromatic brickwork, red with black details. French influences are to be seen in the absence of transepts, the use of the polygonal apse, large rose windows, repetitive wheel windows and the high steep roof.  The west front, richly decorated with a super abundance of ashlar dressings, is a deliberate piece of pure facadism. Three flying buttresses dominate the elevation, providing vertical emphasis to the composition but support nothing. The buttresses are oddly connected to the gable wall with tracery, while out of the central buttress grows a canopied crucifix above which rises a thin bell turret and fleche-like spire (2). At ground level four portals, each with a false gable lead into a narthex.

The plan form was a development of Edward Pugin's work in the 1850s where there was a deliberate attempt to bring the altar nearer to the congregation. As Muthesius observed, "towards the end of the fifties Edward Pugin found a solution which was remarkably similar to that which the Ecclesiologists were trying at the same time: nave and chancel were united into a high and unified space, to which all other parts of the church were subordinated (3). By the mid-1860s this concept had been further refined with increased interior height, a continuous roof line over nave and chancel and greatly reduced aisles. A.W.N Pugin's battle for a remote high altar and screened chancel was lost. The arrangement devised by his son was that of a basilican church in which the altar, priests and people were collected into one uninterrupted area while the aisles were reduced to mere processional ways and approaches to chapels.

Internally the nave and chancel are both exceptionally high, the east end terminating with a polygonal apse. not part of the original scheme, being constructed in 1884. At the back of the altar is the elaborate marble and alabaster reredos forming a buttress to the great central canopy rising to a height of over 40 feet. The bottom of the reredos is composed of two large piers that on the Epistle side containing the piscina and that on the Gospel side the aumbry. On top of these piers are canopied niches, in which are figures of St Anthony, St Clare, St Elizabeth of Hungary and St Bonaventure. Arches with crocketed and traceried gables connect the piers to the walls of the chancel. On either side of the central canopy, which is supported by marble columns, are flying buttresses formed of open tracery work, and at the bottom of these buttresses are piers terminating in niches. In the niche on the Gospel side is a figure of St Francis and in that on the Epistle side is a statue of St Dominic. The throne, supported by two angels, is placed immediately under the central canopy, and is approached by steps following the line of the apsidal chancel at the back of the reredos. The altar and tabernacle stand away from the reredos, and are approached by three stone steps. The altar top is of pure white marble, supported by eight Californian marble shafts, and beneath the altar are panels on which are carved subjects emblematical of the Eucharist. The tabernacle is of alabaster, richly moulded and carved, and has a door of beaten brass.

The chancel window is of three lights divided into seven panels. The rose contains a figure of St George, the five trefoil lights contain the arms of the Order, and emblematic figures of poverty, chastity, humility and obedience. The central light pictures a life-size picture of St Francis and the acts of his life; the one on the left represents the life of St Clare: and the third depicts the life of St Louis of France and other saints of the Third Order. In this way are represented the three Orders instituted by St Francis. Three side altars dedicated to the Sacred Heart, the Virgin mother and St Antony of Padua.  The chancel area is highly elaborate while the nave arcades are supported on tall plain cylindrical stone columns on huge bases, simply chamfered for massive effect. The column capitals are of a simple vertically flared form, frequently described by Pevsner as 'summary capitals' typical of E.W. Pugin. The detailing of the interior has been criticised for being dull and mechanical but while the quality of the architecture may be questioned, the church undoubtedly retains a sense of theatre. Despite its faded air together with the loss of some painted decoration and the original floor tiles in the nave, it can still provide "as rich a setting for Divine Liturgy as can be found anywhere west of Calais."

In his designs for the church Edward Pugin was in many respects heedless of structural honesty and archaeological accuracy. He ignored or flouted all the principles defined by his father and tutor, Augustus Welby Northmore Pugin, who had written in 1841:  There should be no feature about a building which are not necessary for convenience, construction or propriety. All ornament should consist of enrichment of the essential construction of the building.

Adjoining the church are the lodgings for the community, plain and austere brick buildings ranged on two sides of a courtyard. These also were designed by Edward Pugin in 1864. The description in Manchester Faces & Places indicates a larger complex of buildings at the beginning of the twentieth century.

 The monastery adjoining the church forms three sides and a quadrangle. It comprised the reception hall and four reception rooms outside the enclosure; and within the enclosure are Gothic cloisters, the chapter house, library, infirmary, community rooms and about 40 cells. Until a few years ago, the north-east wing of the monastery served as a training college where young students received preparatory education before entering their novitiate; but since the Seraphic College was opened in Buckingham, this part of the building is reserved for the professed students during their philosophical curriculum. There are three parochial day schools - one for infants, another for girls and the third for boys. Recently a parochial hall was erected at an estimated cost of £2000.

 In 1989, with declining numbers of parishioners and friars, the church was declared redundant by the Bishop of Salford. Alternative uses for the church and lodgings were sought and the buildings eventually sold for conversion to housing.

Reference    Building News 5 June 1863 page 438
Reference    Builder 31 October 1863 page 776
Reference    Building News 4 October 1872 page 269
Reference    Manchester Weekly Times 28 September 1872 page 7
Reference    Manchester Guardian 25 September 1872 page 6 – opening
Reference    Nicholas Pevsner - Buildings of England: South Lancashire. Page 327;  illustration 75.
Reference    Stefan Muthesius The High Victorian Movement in Architecture. Page 50-1
Reference    Goodhart-Rendell English Architecture since the Regency Page 137-8
Reference    Cecil Stewart: 'The Stones of Manchester'. Page 98.
Reference    Manchester Faces & Places Vol 11 Page 7
Reference    The Tablet 28 September 1872 page 419
Reference    Dorothy Crowder. Thesis